通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台——DIPasda

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23348

飞行器气动外形数值优化与设计专栏

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台——DIPasda

孙俊峰, 周铸, 黄勇, 庞宇飞, 卢风顺, 许勇

中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所, 绵阳 621000

收稿日期:2019-08-06 修回日期:2019-08-13 出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2020-05-28
通讯作者: 周铸 E-mail:f_yforever@126.com

Digital integrated platform for universal aircraft aerodynamic design optimization: DIPasda

SUN Junfeng, ZHOU Zhu, HUANG Yong, PANG Yufei, LU Fengshun, XU Yong

Computational Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

Received:2019-08-06 Revised:2019-08-13 Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 未来航空工业的发展，需要解决多学科综合设计的关键问题，为新型高性能飞行器的设计提供有力的设计方法和设计工具。DIPasda作为复杂外形设计的通用飞行器多学科优化设计平台，研制目的主要是提供一套新型通用、鲁棒、高效的优化设计架构，应用于通用飞行器工业设计环境，改善传统设计耗时低效的状况，提高新型飞行器设计的效率和精度。DIPasda平台系统包含了优化设计过程中所需用到的各类方法，主要包括数值优化算法、几何模型参数化方法、代理模型方法、高精度的学科分析工具等。通过详细介绍平台的系统架构、主要的功能模块、伴随优化设计和多目标优化设计流程，展现了DIPasda平台系统架构设计的灵活性和功能模块的完备性。最后通过优化算例展示了系统的综合优化设计能力。

关键词: 气动设计, 优化平台, 耦合伴随优化, 进化算法, 多目标优化, 多学科优化

Abstract: The development of the future aviation industry needs to solve the key problems of multidisciplinary integrated design and provide a powerful design method and tools for the design of new high-performance aircraft. This paper presents an automated digitalized integrated platform for aerodynamics synthetic design and assessment (DIPasda) for complex shape. Our goal is to present a new general-purpose, robust, and efficient optimization platform which is aimed at real-life constrained designs where the conventional design approaches are complicated and time-consuming. The DIPasda system consists of a collection of functional modules for performance design and optimization studies by numerical optimization schemes, geometry parameterization techniques, surrogate models, high-fidelity computational analysis tools for different disciplines and so on. By introducing the system architecture of the platform in detail, the main functional modules, adjoint optimization, and multi-objective optimization process, the flexibility of the system architecture design and the completeness of the functional modules are demonstrated. At last, optimization tests are presented to show the system's design optimization capability.

Key words: aerodynamic design, optimization platform, coupling adjoint optimization, evolutionary algorithm, multi-objective optimization, multidiscipline optimization

中图分类号:

V211.3

孙俊峰, 周铸, 黄勇, 庞宇飞, 卢风顺, 许勇. 通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台——DIPasda[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623348-623348.

SUN Junfeng, ZHOU Zhu, HUANG Yong, PANG Yufei, LU Fengshun, XU Yong. Digital integrated platform for universal aircraft aerodynamic design optimization: DIPasda[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(5): 623348-623348.

参考文献 24

[1]	MOHAMMD A Z, BREZILLON J. Shape optimization using the aero-structural coupled adjoint approach for viscous flow[C]//Proceedings of Evolutionary and Deterministic for Design, Optimization and Control, 2011.
[2]	LEOVIRIYAKIT K, JAMESON A. Case studies in aero-structural wing planform and section optimization:AIAA-2004-5372[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2004.
[3]	MELVIN R G, HUFFMAN W P. Recent progress in aerodynamic design optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1999, 30(2):205-216.
[4]	周铸, 黄江涛, 高正红, 等.民用飞机气动外形数值优化设计面临的挑战与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1):522370. ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, GAO Z H, et al. Challenges and prospects of numerical optimization design for laorge civil aircraft aerodynamic shape[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(1):522370(in Chinese).
[5]	STEPHEN T, LEDOU X, WILLIAM W, et al. MDOPT-a multidisciplinary design optimization system using higher order analysis codes[C]//10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[6]	GRAY J, MOOREY K T, NAYLOR B A. OpenMDAO:An open source framework for multidisciplinary analysis and optimization[C]//Proceedings of 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2010.
[7]	JAMESON J, PIERCE N A, MARTINELLI L. Optimum aerodynamics design using the Navier-Stokes equations:AIAA-1997-0101[R]. Reston:AIAA, 1997.
[8]	NIELSEN E J, ANDERSON W K. Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes:AIAA-2001-0596[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2001.
[9]	黄江涛, 周铸, 刘刚, 等.飞行器气动/结构多学科延迟耦合伴随系统数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5):121731. HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, LIU G, et al. Numerical study of aero-structural multidisciplinary lagged coupled adjoint system for aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(5):121731(in Chinese).
[10]	COELLO C A, VAN VELDUIZEN D A, LAMONT G B. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-Objective problems[M]. New York:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
[11]	郑传宇, 黄江涛, 周铸, 等. 飞翼翼型高维多目标空间多学科综合优化设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(4):587-597. ZHENG C Y, HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, et al. Multidisciplinary optimization design of high dimensional target space for flying wing airfoil[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):587-597(in Chinese).
[12]	SOBIESZCZANSKI-SOBIESKI J. Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary optimization for aircraft design:Recent advance and results[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1990, 27(12):993-1001.
[13]	PIEGL L, TILLER W. The NURBS book[M]. Berlin:Springer, 1997.
[14]	MKULFAN B. Recent extensions and applications of the "CST" universal parametric geometry representation method:AIAA-2007-7709[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2007.
[15]	SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R. Freeform deforming of solid geometric models[J]. Computer Graphics, 1986, 22(4):151-160.
[16]	SAMAREH J A. Aerodynamic shape optimization based on free-form deformation:AIAA-2004-4630[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2004.
[17]	PANG Y F, ZHANG S J, SUN J F. An adaptive grid rebuilding method for multi-zone structured grid[C]//6th Asia Workshop on Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006.
[18]	MCKAY M D, CONOVER W J, BECKMAN R J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 1979, 21(3):239-245.
[19]	方开泰, 马长兴. 正交与均匀试验设计[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1980. FANG K T, MA C X. Orthogonal and uniform experimental design[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1980(in Chinese).
[20]	JEONG S, MURAYMA M. Efficient optimization design method using Kriging model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2):413-420.
[21]	肖涵山, 陈作斌, 刘刚, 等. 基于Euler方程的三维自适应笛卡尔网格应用研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2003, 21(2):202-210. XIAO H S, CHEN Z B, LIU G, et al. Applications of 3-D adaptive Cartesian grid algorithm based on the Euler equations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2003, 21(2):202-210(in Chinese).
[22]	牟斌, 肖中云, 周铸, 等. 多重网格技术在复杂粘性流场计算中的应用及研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2006, 24(1):51-54. MOU B, XIAO Z Y, ZHOU Z, et al. Application and investigation of multi-block multi-grid method in complicated viscous flow fields calculation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(1):51-54(in Chinese).
[23]	黄江涛, 高正红, 余婧, 等. 大型民用飞机气动外形典型综合设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2):522369. HUANG J T, GAO Z H, YU J, et al. A typical integrated design method design method for aerodynamics shape optimization of large civil aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(2):522369(in Chinese).
[24]	黄江涛, 周铸, 余婧, 等. 考虑飞行器动力系统进排气效应的设计参数灵敏度分析研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(2):250-258. HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, YU J, et al. Sensitivity analysis of design variables considering intake and exhaust effects[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019,40(2):250-258(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台——DIPasda

Digital integrated platform for universal aircraft aerodynamic design optimization: DIPasda

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁超, 杨力, 潘成胜, 戚耀文. 卫星网络动态资源图多QoS约束路由算法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326422-326422.
[2]	李昊歌, 杨华, 杨雨欣, 陈伟芳. 高超声速升力体迎风面精细化降热优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[3]	邹子缘, 陈琪锋. 基于决策树搜索的空间飞行器集群对抗目标分配方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726910-726910.
[4]	孙刚, 彭双, 陈浩, 伍江江, 李军. 面向测控数传资源一体化场景的卫星地面站资源多目标优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 326114-326114.
[5]	郑帅, 王子涵, 赵浩然, 杨朋涛, 洪军. 基于差分进化算法的飞机油量传感器布局优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125809-125809.
[6]	荆涛, 田锡天. 基于蒙特卡洛-自适应差分进化算法的飞机容差分配多目标优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425278-425278.
[7]	王一雯, 兰夏毓, 史亚云, 华俊, 白俊强, 周铸. 考虑吸气影响的层流翼型梯度优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 527323-527323.
[8]	罗庆, 张涛, 单鹏, 张文涛, 刘子豪. 基于改进Q学习的IMA系统重构蓝图生成方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525792-525792.
[9]	张军峰, 游录宝, 杨春苇, 胡荣. 基于多目标帝国竞争算法的进场排序与调度[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324439-324439.
[10]	叶年辉, 龙腾, 武宇飞, 唐亦帆, 史人赫. 基于Kriging代理模型的约束差分进化算法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324580-324580.
[11]	孙刚, 陈浩, 彭双, 杜春, 李军. 一种基于偏好MOEA的卫星地面站资源多目标优化算法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524475-524475.
[12]	左光, 艾邦成. 先进空间运输系统气动设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 624077-624077.
[13]	何程, 马东立, 贾玉红, 杨穆清, 陈刚. 联翼布局传感器飞机多目标优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 224761-224761.
[14]	刘继新, 江灏, 董欣放, 兰思洁, 王浩哲. 基于空中交通密度的进场航班动态协同排序方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323717-323717.
[15]	罗佳奇, 杨婧. 基于伴随方法的单级低速压气机气动设计优化[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 623368-623368.