考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23079

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

李天梅¹, 司小胜¹, 杨宗浩², 徐从启³, 张琪¹

1. 火箭军工程大学导弹工程学院, 西安 710025;
2. 火箭军士官学校, 青州 262500;
3. 中国人民解放军32181部队, 西安 710032

收稿日期:2019-04-11 修回日期:2019-04-22 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-06-24
通讯作者: 徐从启 E-mail:xcqnudt@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61304103）

Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function

LI Tianmei¹, SI Xiaosheng¹, YANG Zonghao², XU Congqi³, ZHANG Qi¹

1. College of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an 710025, China;
2. The PLA Rocket Force Academy, Qingzhou 262500, China;
3. 32181 Force of PLA, Xi'an 710032, China

Received:2019-04-11 Revised:2019-04-22 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-06-24
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61304103)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对现有测试性增长模型忽略了测试性设计缺陷的修正延时过程，进而导致测试性增长模型（TGM）跟踪与预计精度低的问题，提出了一种考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模理论与方法。首先分析测试性设计缺陷识别与修正之间的延时机理，得到剩余测试性设计缺陷（TDL）具有先增后减的铃形变化趋势；在此基础上，分别以Gamma、Raleigh和Delay-S 3种曲线拟合剩余测试性设计缺陷（RTDL）变化趋势，研究建立基于以上3种曲线考虑修正延时的测试性增长模型；最后，以某机载稳定跟踪平台测试性增长试验数据验证测试性增长模型拟合、跟踪及预计效能。研究结果表明：基于该测试性增长试验数据，Gamma曲线可以精确地拟合剩余测试性设计缺陷变化规律，测试性增长模型跟踪和预计精度可达到10^-2数量级。

关键词: 测试性增长模型, 测试性设计缺陷, 修正延时, Gamma曲线, Rayleigh曲线, Delay-S曲线

Abstract: For existing testability growth models ignores the rectifying process of testability design limitations, causes the testability growth process describes incompletely, and the tracking and projecting imprecise, a Testability Growth Model (TGM) which considers the rectifying delay based on Bell-shaped curve are proposed. Firstly, the mechanism relation between the discovering process of Testability Design Limitation (TDL) and the rectifying process of TDL is analyzed. And on the basis, three bell-shaped curves are used to describe the variation tendency of remaining testability design limitations, the three bell-shaped curves are Rayleigh curve and Delay-S curve, then, TGMs which consider bell-shaped TDL rectifying delay process are founded. Finally, a data set is used to verify the fitting, estimation and prediction of TGM. Result shows that:Gamma curve is more accurate to fit the number of Remaining Testability Design Limitation (RTDL) and that TGM considering the rectifying delay can give good result in fitting, estimation and prediction, and the accuracy of estimation can reach 10^-2 order of magnitude.

Key words: testability growth model, testability design limitation, rectifying delay, Gamma curve, Rayleigh curve, Delay-S curve

中图分类号:

李天梅, 司小胜, 杨宗浩, 徐从启, 张琪. 考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.

LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, YANG Zonghao, XU Congqi, ZHANG Qi. Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.

参考文献 15

[1]	全国量和单位标准化技术委员会.装备测试大纲:GJB2547-1995[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 1995:68-108. National Technical Committee on Quantity and Unit Standardization. Testability program for materiel:GJB2547-1995[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 1995:68-108(in Chinese).
[2]	田仲, 石君友.系统测试性设计分析与验证[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003:361-396. TIAN Z, SHI J Y. Design,analysis and demonstration of system testability[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2003:361-396(in Chinese).
[3]	LI T M, XU C Q, QIU J, et al. The assessment and foundation of bell-shaped testability growth effort functions dependent system testability growth models based on NHPP[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015,27(1):1-18.
[4]	ZHAO C X, QIU J, LIU G J, et al. A testability growth model and its application[C]//IEEE Autotestcon. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2014:121-128.
[5]	ZHAO C X, KRISHINA P, LIU G J, et al. A Markov Chain-based testability growth model with a cost-benefit function[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics:Systems, 2016, 46(4):524-534.
[6]	SCHNEIDEWIND N. Modeling the fault correction process[C]//Proceddings of the 12th International Conference on Software Reliability Engineering, 2001:185-190.
[7]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(6):443-454.
[8]	舒艳君. 故障检测与修正过程的NHPP类软件可靠性增长模型研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009:50-102. SHU Y J. Research on NHPP software reliability growth models of fault detection and correction processes[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009:50-102(in Chinese).
[9]	PHAM H, NORDMANN L, ZHANG X M. A general imperfect software debugging model with s-shaped fault-detection rate[J]. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1999, 48(2):169-176.
[10]	LI Q Y, LI H F, LU M Y, et al. Software reliability growth model with s-shaped testing effort function[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011,37(2):149-160.
[11]	PHAM H, ZHANG X M. NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(8):443-454.
[12]	PHAM H. Software reliability and cost models:Perspectives, comparison and practice[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,149(6):475-489.
[13]	PENG R, LI Y F, ZHANG W J, et al. Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging considering both detection and correction[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2014, 126(4):37-43.
[14]	KAPUR P K, PHAM H, GUPTA A, et al. Software reliability assessment with applications[M]. London:Springer-Verlag, 2011:315-386.
[15]	HUANG C, LIN C. Software reliability analysis by considering fault dependency and debugging time lag[J]. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2006, 55(3):436-450.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法

Foundation and assessment of testability growth model considering testability design limitation rectifying delay function

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 15

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜峰, 李华聪, 符江锋, 洪林雄. 基于RBF和主动学习的非概率可靠度求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 226667-226667.
[2]	薛远亮, 金国栋, 谭力宁, 许剑锟. 基于多尺度融合的自适应无人机目标跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326107-326107.
[3]	牛俊杰, 桑为民, 李栋, 郝莲, 王泽林. 一种基于水滴收集量代理模型的结冰试飞空域确定方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627697-627697.
[4]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	牛戈钊, 刘彦明, 高澜, 张廷焜, 白博文. 等离子鞘套包覆钝锥的双站极化散射特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 97-105.
[6]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[7]	刘艳婷欧吉辉韩宇峰陈杰. 壁面矩形微尺度结构对高速稀薄剪切流的影响[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[8]	刘汉儒陈南树刘宇胡之颉. 多孔介质流动控制及气动降噪研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[9]	宋玉存葛泉波朱军龙陆振宇. 基于梯度差自适应学习率优化的改进YOLOX目标检测算法(重投 22-27580)[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[10]	李西宁叶园园李卫平王守川. 面向形状控制的传感器和作动器布局综合优化研究[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[11]	陈志远, 李璐祎. 参数不确定性下高效的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[12]	罗圣峰, 王光健, 马小斌, 郑丽丽, 汪瑞军. 钛液滴作用下钛合金薄片火蔓延的数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 425652-425652.
[13]	曹明, 王鹏, 左洪福, 曾海军, 孙见忠, 杨卫东, 魏芳, 陈雪峰. 民用航空发动机故障诊断与健康管理现状、挑战与机遇Ⅱ: 地面综合诊断、寿命管理和智能维护维修决策[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625574-625574.
[14]	孙晓哲侯东杨建忠. 双余度机电作动器力纷争机理及敏感性研究（ICGNC2022推荐优秀论文）[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0.
[15]	张晟斐, 李天梅, 胡昌华, 杜党波, 司小胜. 基于深度卷积生成对抗网络的缺失数据生成方法及其在剩余寿命预测中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225708-225708.