风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅱ:数值验证

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22956

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅱ:数值验证

郑文涛, 蒋永松, 赵航, 潘若痴, 赵勇

中国航发沈阳发动机研究所, 沈阳 110015

收稿日期:2019-02-11 修回日期:2019-03-07 出版日期:2019-10-15 发布日期:2019-05-15
通讯作者: 蒋永松 E-mail:ys_jiang_l121@163.com

Low noise design of fan outlet guide vane, part Ⅱ: Numerical verifications

ZHENG Wentao, JIANG Yongsong, ZHAO Hang, PAN Ruochi, ZHAO Yong

Shenyang Engine Research Institute of AECC, Shenyang 110015, China

Received:2019-02-11 Revised:2019-03-07 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为风扇出口导向叶片（Outlet Guide Vanes，OGV）低噪声设计系列文章的第2篇，本文对气动/声学一体化设计获得的2个OGV低噪声方案的降噪效果进行了数值验证。为了对低噪声优化方案的降噪效果进行详细评估，首先，采用非线性谐波法对优化前后的风扇/增压级开展了数值仿真，对OGV不同截面和叶片表面脉动压力进行了对比分析，发现低噪声优化设计方案有效降低了转/静干涉引起的脉动压力；然后，通过掠形和倾斜的合理组合，改变了叶片表面的相位分布，沿径向的相位变化增加了OGV对尾迹响应相互抵消的机会，从而有利于噪声的降低；最后，采用Wilson的波分解方法开展了对各方案的模态分析，对降噪效果进行了量化评估。结果显示，优化后的低噪声方案除起飞状态1BPF外，降噪量均超过了5 dB。

关键词: 大涵道比涡扇发动机, 气动与声学一体化设计, 转/静干涉噪声, 非线性谐波法, 模态分析

Abstract: As the second part of the ‘Low noise design of fan outlet guide vane’ serial articles, this paper numerically evaluates the rotor/stator interaction noise of the two swept and leaned Outlet Guide Vanes (OGVs) obtained in the first paper and explored the noise reduction mechanism. First, a non-linear harmonic method is adopted to simulate the fan stage with different OGVs. The perturbation pressure on several sections and blade surface of OGV is investigated and analyzed. It is found that the perturbation pressure amplitudes of the low-noise design OGVs and the interaction noise are significantly reduced. Then, the optimized combination of sweep and lean resulted in a different distribution of phase on the blade surface. The radical variation of phase enhances the cancelation of the response of OGV to the rotor wake, being conducive of noise reduction. Finally, Wilson's wave splitting method is employed to quantitatively evaluate the sound power levels. The results show that, the rotor/stator interaction noise is reduced dramatically due to the low noise design, and a minimum of 5 dB of noise reduction can be obtained at different power sets except at take off for the 1st BPF.

Key words: high bypass ratio turbofan, aerodynamics-acoustics integrated design, rotor/stator interaction noise, non-linear harmonic method, mode analysis

中图分类号:

V235.13⁺3

郑文涛, 蒋永松, 赵航, 潘若痴, 赵勇. 风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅱ:数值验证[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 122956-122956.

ZHENG Wentao, JIANG Yongsong, ZHAO Hang, PAN Ruochi, ZHAO Yong. Low noise design of fan outlet guide vane, part Ⅱ: Numerical verifications[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(10): 122956-122956.

参考文献 20

[1]	乔渭阳. 航空发动机气动声学[M]. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2010:168-171. QIAO W Y. Aeroacoustic of aeroengines[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2010:168-171(in Chinese).
[2]	LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically. II Turbulence as a source of sound[J]. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 1952, 211(1107):564-587.
[3]	CUMPSTY N A. A critical review of turbomachinery noise[J]. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1977, 99:278-293.
[4]	孙晓峰, 周盛. 气动声学[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1993:94-95. SUN X F, ZHOU S. Aeroacoustics[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 1993:94-95(in Chinese).
[5]	蒋永松, 郑文涛, 赵航, 等. 风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计I:方法与优化[J]. 航空学报,2019,40(10):122955. JIANG Y S, ZHENG W T, ZHAO H, et al. Low noise design of high bypass ratio fan outlet guide vanes,part I:Method and optimization[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2019,40(10):122955(in Chinese).
[6]	WOODWARD R P, ELLIOTT D M, HUGHES C E, et al. Benefit of swept-and-leaned stators for fan noise reduction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 28(6):1130-1138.
[7]	KAZIN S B. Radially leaned outlet guide vanes for fan source noise reduction:CR-134486[R]. Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1973.
[8]	ENVIA E, NALLASAMY M. Design selection and analysis of a swept and leaned stator concept[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,1999, 228(4):793-836.
[9]	张伟光, 王晓宇, 孙晓峰. 叶片弯掠组合设计对风扇气动噪声的被动控制[J]. 航空学报,2017,38(2):120265. ZHANG W G, WANG X Y, SUN X F. Passive control of fan noise by vane sweep and lean[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(2):120265(in Chinese).
[10]	NAMBA M. Three-dimensional analysis of blade force and sound generation for an annular cascade in distorted flows[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1977, 50(4):479-508.
[11]	王晓宇. 传递单元方法及其在航空发动机短舱声学问题中的应用[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学, 2009:66-90. WANG X Y, Transfer element method and its application in the acoustic design of aeroengine[D]. Beijing:Beihang University, 2009:66-90(in Chinese).
[12]	MEYER H D, ENVIA E. Aeroacoustic analysis of turbofan noise generation:CR-4715[R]. Wshington,D.C.:NASA, 1996.
[13]	MAJJIGI R K,GLIEBE P R. Development of a rotor wake/vortex model,Volume I:Final report:CR-174849,[R]. Wshington,D.C.:NASA, 1984.
[14]	HE L, NING W. Efficient approach for analysis of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachines[J]. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(11):2005-2012.
[15]	VILMIN S, LORRAIN E, HIRSCH C. Unsteady flow model across the rotor/stator interface using the nonlinear harmonic method:GT2006-90210[R]. New York:ASME,2006.
[16]	WILSON A G. A method for deriving tone noise information from CFD calculations on the aeroengine fan Stage[C]//NATO RTO-AVT Symposium on Developments in Computational Aero-and Hydro-Acoustics, 2001.
[17]	GIACCHÉ D, XU L, COUPLAND J, et al. A comparison between postprocessing methods applied to rotor-stator-interaction tone-noise problems[J]. AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(6):1214-1229.
[18]	NUMECA International. FINETM/Turbo 11.2-User Guide[M].Brussels:NUMECA International:12-17.
[19]	ENVIA E, NALLASAMY M. Design selection and analysis of a swept and leaned stator concept[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 228(4):793-836.
[20]	TYLER J M, SOFRIN T G. Axial flow compressor noise studies[J]. SAE Trans, 1962, 70:309-332.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅱ:数值验证

Low noise design of fan outlet guide vane, part Ⅱ: Numerical verifications

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒋永松, 郑文涛, 赵航, 杨明绥, 王咏梅. 风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅰ:方法与优化[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 122955-122955.
[2]	温卓群, 王鹏飞, 张雁, 蒋艳芬. 面向大尺度结构的力学超材料减振技术[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(S1): 721651-721651.
[3]	王志强, 沈锡钢, 胡骏. 反推状态下大涵道比涡扇发动机气动稳定性预测与评估[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(2): 120192-120202.
[4]	龙凯, 谷先广, 王选. 基于多相材料的连续体结构动态轻量化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(10): 221022-221022.
[5]	谭光辉, 李秋彦, 邓俊. 热环境下结构固有振动特性试验及分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(S1): 32-37.
[6]	曲巍崴, 方垒, 柯映林, 方伟, 刘思仁, 邢宏文. 环形轨道制孔系统定位方法分析[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(8): 2319-2330.
[7]	朱剑锋, 黄国平, 傅鑫, 付勇. 基于POD方法的弯曲扩压通道分离流控制的时空特性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(4): 921-932.
[8]	陈果, 罗云, 郑其辉, 侯民利, 蒲柳. 复杂空间载流管道系统流固耦合动力学模型及其验证[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(3): 597-609.
[9]	唐炜, 乔倩, 史忠科. 频域最小二乘辨识方法的参数约束条件选取[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2253-2260.
[10]	卫洪涛, 孔宪仁, 王本利, 张相盟. 一种分段线性边界条件连续体振动响应求解方法[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(12): 2236-2243.
[11]	任宗金;孙宝元;张军;钱敏. 轨/姿控火箭发动机推力矢量动态测试系统测量原理与动态性能[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(11): 2037-2044.
[12]	付志超;程伟;徐成. 基于LS-SVM的模态参数识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(11): 2087-2092.
[13]	吴江浩;王济康;孙茂. 蜜蜂悬停飞行控制的仿生力学研究[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(4): 776-782.
[14]	史友进;张曾錩. 大柔性飞机着陆撞击多质量块等效模型[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(4): 635-640.
[15]	王彤;张令弥. 运行模态分析的频域空间域分解法及其应用[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(1): 62-66.