高超声速可变形双翼气动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.121352

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

高超声速可变形双翼气动特性

刘姝含^1,2, 朱战霞^1,2

1. 西北工业大学航天学院, 西安 710072;
2. 航天飞行动力学技术国家级重点实验室, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2017-04-25 修回日期:2017-05-31 出版日期:2017-09-15 发布日期:2017-06-02
通讯作者: 朱战霞 E-mail:zhuzhanxia@nwpu.edu.cn

Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic morphing biplane

LIU Shuhan^1,2, ZHU Zhanxia^1,2

1. College of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Aerospace Flight Dynamics, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2017-04-25 Revised:2017-05-31 Online:2017-09-15 Published:2017-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究高超声速可变形双翼在不同迎角和不同马赫数条件下的气动特性，并针对在给定的迎角和马赫数条件下可变形双翼的舵面偏转角选取困难的问题，通过结合二分法、遗传算法和高斯牛顿算法对处于不同迎角和不同马赫数条件下的可变形双翼的舵面偏转角进行了选取确定，分析了可变形双翼的气动特性和舵面偏转角对其气动特性产生影响的机理。研究表明：当来流马赫数为5，迎角从1°~8°变化时，可变形双翼的升阻比明显大于Busemann双翼的升阻比，最大可达4.2倍；当迎角为3°，来流马赫数从0.5~5变化时，可变形双翼的升阻比最大可达Busemann双翼升阻比的3.4倍。结果表明可变形双翼在大迎角和大速度范围内均能保持高升阻比，在高超声速飞行中将具有更好的应用价值和前景。

关键词: 高超声速, 可变形双翼, 舵面偏转角, 升阻比, 迎角, 马赫数

Abstract:

To study the aerodynamic performance of the morphing biplane under different angles of attack and different Mach numbers, as well as the difficulty in selecting the deflection angle of rudder with given angle of attack and Mach number, this paper combines dichotomy, genetic algorithm and Gauss-Newton algorithm to determine the deflection angle of rudder of the morphing biplane under different angles of attack and different Mach numbers. The aerodynamic characteristics of the morphing biplane and the influence of the deflection angle of rudder on the aerodynamic characteristics are analyzed. It is shown that as the Mach number is 5, and the angle of attack ranges from 1°to 8°, the lift-drag ratio of the morphing biplane is obviously greater (up to 4.2 times) than that of Busemann biplane. When the angle of attack is 3°, and the Mach number ranges from 0.5 to 5, the lift-drag ratio of the morphing biplane can be up to 3.4 times than that of Busemann biplane. These results indicate that the morphing biplane can maintain a high lift-drag ratio at large angle of attack and high speed range, and has better applicability and prospects in hypersonic flight.

Key words: hypersonic, morphing biplane, deflection angle of rudder, lift-drag ratio, angle of attack, Mach number

中图分类号:

V211.3

刘姝含, 朱战霞. 高超声速可变形双翼气动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9): 121352-121352.

LIU Shuhan, ZHU Zhanxia. Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic morphing biplane[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(9): 121352-121352.

参考文献

[1] SZIROCZAK D, SMITH H. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2016, 84(7): 1-28.
[2] BUSEMANN A. Aerodynamic lift at supersonic speeds[C]//The 5th Volta Aerodynamic Conference, 1935.
[3] BUSEMANN A. The relation between minimized drag and noise at supersonic speed[C]//The High-Speed Aeronautics Conference, 1955.
[4] LICHER R M. Optimum two-dimensional multiplanes in supersonic flow[C]//Douglass Aircraft Conference, 1955.
[5] 华如豪, 叶正寅. 基于Busemann双翼构型的超音速导弹减阻技术研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2012, 29(5): 536-540. HUA R H, YE Z Y. Drag reduction method for supersonic missile based on Busemann biplane concept[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2012, 29(5): 536-540 (in Chinese).
[6] PATIDAR V K, YADAV R, JOSHI S. Numerical investigation of the effect of stagger on the aerodynamic characteristics of a Busemann biplane[J]. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2016, 55(8): 252-263.
[7] YAMASHITA H, KURATANI N, YONEZAWA M, et al. Wind tunnel testing on start/unstart characteristics of finite supersonic biplane wing[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2013(6): 1-10.
[8] MARUYAMA D, MATSUSHIMA K, KUSUNOSE K, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic design of low-wave-drag supersonic biplane using inverse problem method[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 46(6): 1906-1918.
[9] YONEZAWA M, OBAYASHI S. Aerodynamic performance of the three-dimensional lifting supersonic biplane[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 47(3): 983-991.
[10] DAN I, ARAD E. A parametric study of an axisymetric Busemann biplane configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 46(6): 1930-1937.
[11] MARUYAMA D, KUSUNOSE K, MATSUSHIMA K, et al. Aerodynamic analysis and design of Busemann biplane: Towards efficient supersonic flight[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 226(2): 217-238.
[12] 李占科, 张翔宇, 冯晓强, 等. 超声速双层翼翼型的阻力特性研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2014(4): 483-488. LI Z K, ZHANG X Y, FENG X Q, et al. The study on the drag characteristic of supersonic biplane[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014(4): 483-488 (in Chinese).
[13] XU Y Z, XU Z Q, LI S G, et al. A hypersonic lift mechanism with decoupled lift and drag surfaces[J]. Science China: Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2013, 56(5): 981-988.
[14] HU R, JAMESON A, WANG Q Q. Adjoint-based aerodynamic optimization of supersonic biplane airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(3): 802-814.
[15] HU R. Supersonic biplane design via adjoint method[D]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2009.
[16] KUSUNOSE K. A fundamental study for the development of boomless supersonic transport aircraft[C]//The 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2006.
[17] MATSUSHIMA K, TAKANASHI S. An inverse design method for wings using integral equations and its recent progress[C]//Proceedings of Lectures and Workshop International Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Technology and Modeling, 2008.
[18] KUSUNOSE K, MATSUSHIMA K, MARUYAMA D. Supersonic biplane-A review[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47(1): 53-87.
[19] YAMASHITA H, YONEZAWA M, OBAYASHI S, et al. A study of Busemann-type biplane for avoiding choked flow[C]//The 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2007.
[20] 赵承熙, 叶正寅, 华如豪. 新型目标压力分布下的Licher双翼反设计方法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(5): 610-616. ZHAO C X, YE Z Y, HUA R H. Inverse design method for the Licher biplane with a new target pressure distributio[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 610-616 (in Chinese).
[21] TIAN Y, AGARWAL R K. Shape optimization of Busemann-type biplane airfoil for drag reduction under non-lifting and lifting conditions using genetic algorithms[C]//Optimization Algorithms-Methods and Applications, 2015.
[22] HUANG L, HUANG G, LEBEAU R P, et al. Optimization of aifoil flow control using a genetic algorithm with diversity control[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 44(4): 1337-1349.
[23] GURUSWAMY G. Dynamic stability analysis of hypersonic transport during reentry[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(11): 3374-3381.
[24] CROSSLEY W A, LAANANEN D H. Conceptual design of helicopters via genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 33(6): 1062-1070.
[25] MINOT A, LU Y M, LI N. A distributed Gauss-Newton method for power system state estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 31(5): 3804-3815.
[26] BAO J F, LI C, SHEN W P, et al. Approximate Gauss-Newton methods for solving underdetermined nonlinear least squares problems[J]. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2017, 111(1): 92-110.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

高超声速可变形双翼气动特性

Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic morphing biplane

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙志坤, 史志伟, 张伟麟, 李铮, 孙琪杰. 等离子体激励器对高速翼型升阻特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[2]	化为卓, 高岭, 陈戈, 李益文, 巩耕, 王延涛, 魏彪. 基于等离子体炬的磁流体动力学实验系统[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[3]	黄依峰, 曾舒华, 江中正, 陈伟芳. 非线性耦合本构在高空侧向喷流中的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 8-22.
[4]	罗凯, 王永海, 汪球, 栗继伟, 李峥, 聂春生, 李铮. 高焓风洞中等离子体激励流动控制试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[5]	张旭东, 李铮, 董昊, 高思源, 纪祖赑, 黎凯昕, 白光辉. 高超声速流场等离子体逆向喷流减阻特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.
[6]	胡守超, 庄宇, 李贤, 江涛. 高超声速气动热标模HyHERM-Ⅰ试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 233-248.
[7]	李昊歌, 杨华, 杨雨欣, 陈伟芳. 高超声速升力体迎风面精细化降热优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[8]	吴东, 杨鸿, 赵文峰, 罗跃. 高超声速飞行器碳基结构高温应变测量[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 160-169.
[9]	聂春生, 袁野, 马伟, 曹占伟, 于明星. 主动引射气体参数对平板空气舵气动热影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 170-179.
[10]	马正雪, 罗振兵, 赵爱红, 周岩, 谢玮, 刘强, 朱寅鑫, 彭文强. 高超声速流场等离子体合成射流逆向喷流特性[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[11]	刘传振, 孟旭飞, 刘荣健, 白鹏. 双后掠乘波体高超声速试验与数值分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[12]	李珺, 王俊峰, 赵雅甜, 罗世彬. 面向非设计工况的激波针-喷流复合构型研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 125949-125949.
[13]	郑辉, 邱雷, 袁慎芳, 杨晓飞, 卢绪龙, 薛兆鹏. C/C热防护结构高温气流损伤导波监测实验方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225659-225659.
[14]	刘清扬, 雷娟棉, 刘周, 石磊, 周伟江. 适用于可压缩流动的γ-Re_θt-f_Re转捩模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125794-125794.
[15]	刘强, 涂国华, 罗振兵, 陈坚强, 赵瑞, 袁先旭. 延迟高超声速边界层转捩技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 25357-025357.