超高强度钢立铣工件温度分析及对加工表面质量的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0261

材料工程与机械制造

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 |

超高强度钢立铣工件温度分析及对加工表面质量的影响

杨升¹, 董琼¹, 彭芳瑜², 林森¹, 闫蓉¹

1. 华中科技大学国家数控系统工程技术研究中心, 武汉 430074;
2. 华中科技大学数字制造装备与技术国家重点实验室, 武汉 430074

收稿日期:2014-06-24 修回日期:2014-09-16 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2014-10-08
通讯作者: 彭芳瑜Tel.: 027-87543747 E-mail: zwm8917@263.net E-mail:zwm8917@263.net
作者简介:杨升男, 硕士研究生。主要研究方向: 切削加工机理及加工表面质量。 Tel: 027-87542613 E-mail: 101sunrise101@163.com;彭芳瑜男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 多轴数控加工、超精密加工、数控系统性能仿真。 Tel: 027-87543747 E-mail: zwm8917@263.net
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划 (2011CB706803); 国家自然科学基金 (51121002); 湖北省重大科技创新计划(2013AAA008)

Workpiece temperature analysis and its impact on machined surface quality of ultra-high strength steel in end milling

YANG Sheng¹, DONG Qiong¹, PENG Fangyu², LIN Sen¹, YAN Rong¹

1. National Numerical Control System Engineering Research Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2014-06-24 Revised:2014-09-16 Online:2015-05-15 Published:2014-10-08
Supported by:
National Program on Key Basic Research Project (2011CB706803); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51121002); Key Technology Innovation Project of Hubei Province of China (2013AAA008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以航空难加工材料300M钢为研究对象,基于立铣加工中的工件温度判断在铣削加工中是否出现了金相组织转变,进而分析不同工况下影响加工表面质量的因素。首先,将移动热源法应用于铣削加工中,计算考虑后刀面磨损的立铣加工工件温度,实验表明,计算值与实验值相比误差在10%以内。然后,分析了工件温度在时间上与空间上的分布,以及不同刀具磨损和加工参数条件下工件表面的温升规律,据此预测加工表面是否出现了组织转变,并结合金相组织观察进一步确认。最后,依据加工表面质量物理层面残余应力和显微硬度的检测数据,初步探讨了各因素对表面质量的影响。结果表明,在研究的加工参数范围内,并未达到金相组织转变温度,表面质量主要受铣削热力作用下的剪切面塑性凸出效应、后刀面挤光效应和热效应的影响。

关键词: 300M钢, 立铣, 工件温度, 相变, 残余应力, 显微硬度

Abstract:

300M steel is chosen for the research object, which is the typical difficult-to-cut material in aviation industry. Microstructure changes are judged in milling based on the workpiece temperature. Then the main factors affecting the quality of the machined surface are also analyzed under different cutting conditions. Firstly, moving heat source method is applied to the milling process. The workpiece temperature model of end milling is established considering the flank rubbing effect. The temperature model is confirmed by the temperature measuring experiment and the error is less than 10%. Secondly, Temperature model is used to analyze the temperature variation on the workpiece surface over time, as well as the distribution along the depth into workpiece. The influences of processing parameters and tool wear on the surface temperature rise are studied. Finally, the quality of machined surface in physical level such as residual stress and microhardness is analyzed with different cutting conditions according to the test data. The results show that within the range of processing parameters studied, workpiece temperature is not higher than the phase transformation temperature. So, surface quality is mainly affected by the plastic bulge, flank squeezing and thermal effect caused by the milling force and temperature.

Key words: 300M steel, end milling, workpiece temperature, phase transformation, residual stress, microhardness

中图分类号:

杨升, 董琼, 彭芳瑜, 林森, 闫蓉. 超高强度钢立铣工件温度分析及对加工表面质量的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1722-1732.

YANG Sheng, DONG Qiong, PENG Fangyu, LIN Sen, YAN Rong. Workpiece temperature analysis and its impact on machined surface quality of ultra-high strength steel in end milling[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(5): 1722-1732.

参考文献

[1] Wu J. Study on the influence of polishing after shot peening on 300M steel[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007 (in Chinese). 武俊. 300M钢喷丸强化工艺中打磨问题的研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007.
[2] Outwater J O, Shaw M C. Surface temperatures in grinding [J]. Transactions of the ASME, 1952, 74(1): 73-78.
[3] Komanduri R, Hou Z B. Thermal modeling of the metal cutting process — Part III: temperature rise distribution due to the combined effects of shear plane heat source and the tool-chip interface frictional heat source[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2001, 43(1): 89-107.
[4] Li L W, Li B, Ehmann K F, et al. A thermo-mechanical model of dry orthogonal cutting and its experimental validation through embedded micro-scale thin film thermocouple arrays in PCBN tooling[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2013, 70: 70-87.
[5] Richardson D J, Keavey M A, Dailami F. Modelling of cutting induced workpiece temperatures for dry milling [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2006, 46(10): 1139-1145.
[6] Chen Y, Yang S B, Fu Y C, et al. FEM estimation of tool wear in high speed cutting of Ti6Al4V alloy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(9): 2230-2240 (in Chinese). 陈燕, 杨树宝, 傅玉灿, 等. 钛合金TC4高速切削刀具磨损的有限元仿真[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(9): 2230-2240.
[7] Kuo H, Meyer K, Lindle R, et al. Estimation of milling tool temperature considering coolant and wear[J]. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2012, 134(3): 31001-31002.
[8] Lin S, Peng F Y, Wen J, et al. An investigation of workpiece temperature variation in end milling considering flank rubbing effect[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2013, 73: 71-86.
[9] Remes H, Korhonen E, Lehto P, et al. Influence of surface integrity on the fatigue strength of high-strength steels[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 89: 21-29.
[10] Hu C Y, Liu X L, Chen X, et al. Failure analysis of rotating shaft in main undercarriage [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 461-468 (in Chinese). 胡春燕, 刘新灵, 陈星, 等. 主起落架上转轴开裂原因分析[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(2): 461-468.
[11] Wang L T, Ke Y L, Huang Z G, et al. Study on residual stress produced in milling of aeronautic structure [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2003, 24(3): 286-288 (in Chinese). 王立涛, 柯映林, 黄志刚, 等. 航空结构件铣削残余应力分布规律的研究[J]. 航空学报, 2003, 24(3): 286-288.
[12] Du S G, Jiang Z, Zhang D H, et al. Softening mechanism of grinding surface metamorphic layer of GH4169DA[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(5): 1446-1451 (in Chinese). 杜随更, 姜哲, 张定华, 等. GH4169DA磨削表面变质层软化机理[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(5): 1446-1451.
[13] Navas V G, Gonzalo O, Bengoetxea I. Effect of cutting parameters in the surface residual stresses generated by turning in AISI 4340 steel[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2012, 61: 48-57.
[14] Sun J, Guo Y B. A comprehensive experimental study on surface integrity by end milling Ti-6Al-4V[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(8): 4036-4042.
[15] Varela P I, Rakurty C S, Balaji A K. Surface integrity in hard machining of 300M steel: effect of cutting-edge geometry on machining induced residual stresses[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2014, 13: 288-293
[16] Zhou Z H. The theory of metal cutting[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1992: 62 (in Chinese). 周泽华. 金属切削理论[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1992: 62.
[17] Shaw M C. Metal cutting principles [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc., 2005: 206.
[18] Xu Q J. Study of grinding with no burn and low stress on 300M ultra-high strength steel[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 1992 (in Chinese). 徐庆九. 300M超高强度钢无烧伤低应力磨削的研究 [D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 1992.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

超高强度钢立铣工件温度分析及对加工表面质量的影响

Workpiece temperature analysis and its impact on machined surface quality of ultra-high strength steel in end milling

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘占, 张俊, 尹佳, 赵万华. 基于机器视觉的立铣刀几何与状态参数在机检测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 425593-425593.
[2]	刘振东, 郑锡涛, 范雯静, 张东健. 固化残余应力对无人机复合材料机翼强度的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526117-526117.
[3]	李汇, 李光先, 高瑞麟, 金鑫, 刘璐, 李朝将, Songlin DING. 不锈钢增材制造件后处理工艺研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525847-525847.
[4]	杨建凯, 顾冬冬, 葛庆, 檀晨晨, 文雨. 铝合金激光增材制造支撑布局及精确成形机制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[5]	胡宪亮, 乔红超, 赵吉宾, 陆莹, 吴嘉俊, 杨玉奇. 激光冲击波对单晶合金抗热腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525591-525591.
[6]	尚勇, 冯阳, 刘巧沐, 王君武, 杨惠君, 茹毅, 张恒, 赵文月, 裴延玲, 李树索, 宫声凯. 大型科学装置在航空发动机高温结构材料和涂层上的研究与应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527481-527481.
[7]	王连庆, 胡雅楠, 车志刚, 吴圣川. 激光冲击强化7075铝合金熔焊接头的疲劳性能[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524320-524320.
[8]	韩坤鹏, 张定华, 姚倡锋, 谭靓, 周征. 滚压强化表面状态特征的疲劳演化及抗疲劳机制研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524302-524302.
[9]	赵波, 姜燕, 别文博. 超声滚压技术在表面强化中的研究与应用进展[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(10): 23685-023685.
[10]	孙维国, 史瑞华, 林左鸣, 刘代军, 张文山, 曹军伟, 范中国, 马聪慧, 付泽川, 刘爱华, 田鹏, 钱勤建, 陈飞, 段磊, 崔金平, 梁晓嘉. 基于固液相变燃料的冲压发动机[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 122780-122780.
[11]	杜旭, 张腾, 何宇廷, 张天宇, 张胜, 冯宇. 孔冷挤压有限元仿真中的铰削分界面位置确定方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(4): 422674-422674.
[12]	苟磊, 马玉娥, 杜永, 刘磊, 郭超, 李钢. 7050凹槽铝板激光冲击强化残余应力分布与疲劳寿命[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 423096-423096.
[13]	郭向东, 王梓旭, 李明, 刘蓓. 结冰风洞中液滴相变效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(3): 121586-121586.
[14]	王燕礼, 朱有利, 曹强, 张小辉. 孔挤压强化技术研究进展与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 21336-021336.
[15]	王晓明, 朱胜, 杨柏俊, 张垚, 徐安阳. 磁场辅助激光熔覆铝基金属玻璃覆层[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11): 422134-422142.